Submission timeline
2007–2026One slot for every year since HN launched. Height is that year's peak points; orange marks a 100+ point or 50+ comment breakout. Select a bar to open its strongest thread.
First comments on top threads
HN comment orderI did my PhD in a group with ~20 students and postdocs including many co-supervised with some other department. The prof in charge of the group had his name on > 90% of the papers we published, I believe justifiably. He would have read all of them, and written sections where appropriate, and had a hand in directing and organizing the research as well as challenging the results and strengthening the presentation of the paper. So he was probably on…
This is a great study and gives insights in to what's wrong with research today. As the study has uncovered the causes: - mentorship of very many young researchers - leadership of a research team - becoming full professors, department chairs - leadership roles in large centres As the paper states: at the peak of their productivity, some cardiologists publish 10 to 80 times more papers in one year compared with their average annual productivity when they were 35–42 years…
The first top-level comment from each of the four biggest threads, in HN’s own order. Excerpts are shortened; open a comment for full context.
- Breakout years
- 2
- Total points
- 284
- Total comments
- 185
100+ points or 50+ comments
reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking
reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking
Every submission
| Date | Title as submitted | By | Points | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-12 | Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five daysFirst breakout | chriskanan | 122 | 41 |
| 2018-09-13 | Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days | sohkamyung | 1 | 0 |
| 2023-01-05 | Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days (2018) | tlb | 2 | 0 |
| 2023-01-06 | Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five daysBest thread · Latest 20+ point return | sebg | 159 | 144 |
