Submission timeline
2007–2026One slot for every year since HN launched. Height is that year's peak points; orange marks a 100+ point or 50+ comment breakout. Select a bar to open its strongest thread.
First comments on top threads
HN comment order> Perhaps one of the most prominent objections to devoting a lot of time to mathematics is that it can be years before you ever apply mathematics to writing programs. On one hand, this is an extremely valid concern. If you love writing programs and designing software, then mathematics is a nothing more than a tool to help you write better programs. Calling it an "extremely valid concern" is understating it. The dilemma is that programmers have many, many roads…
All right, so this article can be probably condensed to these two points: 1. "Mathematics is hard and inconsistent, but so is programming". Well, yes, but this is exactly the problem! I pity poor souls who started their journey into programming with, say, C++ — the champion of consistency and elegancy. But there are other ways and other languages. And, with some effort, it _is_ possible to provide gentle introduction into programming world. The same should apply for mathematics. 2…
While there is no "royal road" to mathematics for programmers who don't care about proofs, there is a programmer's road to proofs for those interested in Math. In fact, the book is even called "The Haskell Road to Logic, Maths and Programming" [0]. It covers mathematical notation, proof construction, and lots of interesting portions of discrete math that should be of interest to programmers. And large portions of the results are demonstrated or used in interesting Haskell programs. [0]…
The first top-level comment from each of the four biggest threads, in HN’s own order. Excerpts are shortened; open a comment for full context.
- Breakout years
- 2
- Total points
- 486
- Total comments
- 307
100+ points or 50+ comments
reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking
reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking
Every submission
| Date | Title as submitted | By | Points | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-02-08 | Why there is no Hitchhiker’s Guide to Mathematics for ProgrammersFirst breakout · Best thread | disgruntledphd2 | 213 | 75 |
| 2013-09-08 | Why there is no Hitchhiker’s Guide to Mathematics for Programmers | dominotw | 108 | 102 |
| 2016-02-18 | Why There Is No Hitchhiker’s Guide to Mathematics for ProgrammersLatest 20+ point return | iamwil | 145 | 130 |
| 2017-10-17 | Why There Is No Hitchhiker’s Guide to Mathematics for Programmers | 10-6 | 4 | 0 |
| 2017-12-28 | Why there is no Hitchhiker’s Guide to Mathematics for Programmers (2013)Hall induction | nazka | 4 | 0 |
| 2018-08-28 | Why There Is No Hitchhiker’s Guide to Mathematics for Programmers | ColinWright | 4 | 0 |
| 2021-10-01 | Why there is no Hitchhiker’s Guide to Mathematics for Programmers (2013) | Jtsummers | 5 | 0 |
| 2022-03-14 | Why there is no Hitchhiker’s Guide to Mathematics for Programmers (2013) | graderjs | 3 | 0 |
