Submission timeline
2007–2026One slot for every year since HN launched. Height is that year's peak points; orange marks a 100+ point or 50+ comment breakout. Select a bar to open its strongest thread.
First comments on top threads
HN comment orderTo me, Alexandra Elbakyan is kind of like a Martin Luther of science. That is, she enables the lay public to read and interpret science rather than awaiting the interpretation and approval of academics from high-status institutions. That may be a ‘sacrilege’ view here, given the audience of HN. And, in a way, I do feel somewhat nervous of people making decisions based on papers they read without understanding of the philosophy and practice of science. Yet, it’s unavoidable and…
Frankly, scientific publishers represent institutionalised theft of tax payer money: - Academics (most often publicly funded via grants and university salaries) do the work for free. - They are expected to learn to use LaTeX and to typeset their work for free. - They are expected to copy-edit the papers for free, or else pay a copy editor themselves with, you guessed it, public funds. - Volunteer Academics (on university time and therefore, again, public money) are expected to review…
The first top-level comment from each of the four biggest threads, in HN’s own order. Excerpts are shortened; open a comment for full context.
- Breakout years
- 2
- Total points
- 830
- Total comments
- 358
100+ points or 50+ comments
reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking
reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking
Every submission
| Date | Title as submitted | By | Points | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-08 | Science’s Pirate QueenFirst breakout · Best thread | IntronExon | 496 | 251 |
| 2019-09-27 | Science’s pirate queenLatest 20+ point return | ColinWright | 331 | 107 |
| 2022-03-09 | Science’s Pirate Queen | graderjs | 3 | 0 |
