HN Hall of Fame Weekly email

It's Charisma, Stupid (2004)

www.paulgraham.com Essays & writing Essays & articles Society & policy Class of 2016-05 Hall of Fame
Screenshot of www.paulgraham.com captured 2026-07-20
Page preview · captured 2026-07-20

Resurfaced independently across 7 calendar years, with breakout response in 2 of them.

submissions
12
submitters
12
observed span
2008–2023
peak thread · 131 comments
141 pts
latest 20+ return · 2016-11-09
141 pts

Submission timeline

2007–2026

One slot for every year since HN launched. Height is that year's peak points; orange marks a 100+ point or 50+ comment breakout. Select a bar to open its strongest thread.

First comments on top threads

HN comment order

As someone aptly put it on twitter (Nate Cohn), the "white working class" is voting like a minority block--and why would they not? The elites have ignored the working class (white and black) for ages and when they do think of them, white (and other) elites look down at them with the contempt of 'white privilege' while they, the elite whites, sit comfortably in their protected perches rarely exposing themselves to insecurity. It's possible this is a consequence of overplaying…

mc32·141-point thread·

I want to nod along with this, but I can't shake the feeling that it's just too simplistic, with too small of a dataset. So Johnson was supposedly more charismatic than Goldwater, and that's why he won, not because Kennedy had been murdered 11 months earlier? Nixon beat Humphrey because he avoided a heads-up showdown, not because Humphrey had just served as Johnson's yes-man for several unpopular years in Vietnam? Carter beat Ford because he was charismatic, not because Ford…

My first impression was that you were doing a lot of work to explain every single exception or near-exception to your theory. The case of Gore winning the popular vote is probably the most damaging. I'd consider downgrading the claim to "As video becomes more prevalent, charisma is an increasingly powerful factor." If you really believe your theory, you should buy Obama for president on Intrade. In fact, you should have bought Obama back when he was trading at 30%…

Eliezer·29-point thread·

The first top-level comment from each of the four biggest threads, in HN’s own order. Excerpts are shortened; open a comment for full context.

Breakout years
2

100+ points or 50+ comments

Total points
277

reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking

Total comments
246

reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking

Every submission

DateTitle as submittedByPointsComments
2008-02-12It's Charisma, StupidFirst breakoutmqt2967
2011-09-13It's Charisma, Stupid (2004, updated 2006)shawndumas20
2012-10-28Paul Graham on presidential elections: It's Charisma Stupid [2004/2006]FrojoS20
2016-03-07It's Charisma, Stupid (2004)brhsiao10
2016-03-28It's Charisma, Stupid (2004)applecore10
2016-05-05It's Charisma, Stupid (2004)Hall inductionjackweirdy92131
2016-05-17It's Charisma, Stupid (2006)denzil_correa30
2016-11-09It's Charisma, Stupid (2004)Best thread · Latest 20+ point returnpashapiro14148
2019-03-30In US presidential elections, the more charismatic candidate wins. (2004)js210
2020-11-07It's Charisma, Stupid (2006)tosh20
2020-11-10It's Charisma, Stupid (2004)ikeboy20
2023-02-03It's Charisma, Stupidfronterablog10