HN Hall of Fame Weekly email

Room 641A

en.wikipedia.org Reference Encyclopedia entries Security & privacy Class of 2020-05 Hall of Fame
Screenshot of en.wikipedia.org captured 2026-07-20
Page preview · captured 2026-07-20

Resurfaced independently across 8 calendar years, with breakout response in 3 of them.

submissions
8
submitters
8
observed span
2011–2026
peak thread · 75 comments
333 pts
latest 20+ return · 2024-09-11
51 pts

Submission timeline

2007–2026

One slot for every year since HN launched. Height is that year's peak points; orange marks a 100+ point or 50+ comment breakout. Select a bar to open its strongest thread.

First comments on top threads

HN comment order

One day I was getting out of my car to carry groceries into my house. Our nice neighbor was passing on the sidewalk at that moment, saw the EFF hat I was wearing, and asked me about it. "Do you work for the EFF?" "No, but I throw some money at them when I can because I like them." "Oh. I like them, too. They helped me out a lot once." "Oh yeah? For what?" He laughed. "I'm Mark Klein…

> [The class action lawsuit against AT&T] was dismissed on December 29, 2011 based on a retroactive grant of immunity by Congress for telecommunications companies that cooperated with the government. What an overreach of power on the part of Congress. Something goes to court to discuss its legality, and then Congress retroactively declares it to be legal? Yikes.

I work across the street from this building. One thing I noticed is that in early 2015 they boarded up the balcony on the 6th floor. Presumably it was to stop someone from gaining access to this room by climbing up the side of the building and breaking in through the balcony door. http://imgur.com/SA4DRjo

magila·207-point thread·

...the case was ... dismissed ... based on a retroactive grant of immunity by Congress for telecommunications companies that cooperated with the government. I thought ex post facto laws were expressly forbidden by the Constitution (minus certain exceptions [1] that have arisen in case law over the years). Did it work in this case because it was a civil instead of criminal matter? [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_post_facto_law#United_Sta...

The first top-level comment from each of the four biggest threads, in HN’s own order. Excerpts are shortened; open a comment for full context.

Breakout years
3

100+ points or 50+ comments

Total points
882

reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking

Total comments
196

reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking

Every submission

DateTitle as submittedByPointsComments
2011-03-23Room 641Ahyperbovine10
2012-09-27(2006) Room 614A: AT&T spying collaboration with the NSAzupreme10
2013-06-09Room 641AFirst breakoutllambda24844
2016-09-16Room 641Amimsee20775
2020-05-29Room 641AHall induction · Best threadhourislate33370
2022-09-26Room 641Athunderbong292
2024-09-11Room 641ALatest 20+ point returnjihadjihad515
2026-03-14Room 641Amxmilkiib120