Submission timeline
2007–2026One slot for every year since HN launched. Height is that year's peak points; orange marks a 100+ point or 50+ comment breakout. Select a bar to open its strongest thread.
First comments on top threads
HN comment orderThere is at least one thing wrong about this. This is an essay about a paper published a simulation based scenarios in medical research. It then try to generalize to "research" and avoid this very narrow support to the claim. I think this is something true and it should make us more cautious when deciding based on single studies. But things are different in other fields. Also this is called research. You don't know the answer before head. You have…
This was a very controversial paper when it was published, perhaps because of its incendiary title. But the paper is much more subtle than the title suggests. Basically the idea is that if you try to test phenomena that are completely unexpected, your prior odds are low, so even if you get a positive result, there is a good chance the result is incorrect. So there is a danger that by trying to ensure more correct results, scientists may avoid…
I read this a few years ago. It such an important topic. Billions of dollars have been spent doing research in fields like nutrition and psychology with very little ROI.
The first top-level comment from each of the four biggest threads, in HN’s own order. Excerpts are shortened; open a comment for full context.
- Breakout years
- 2
- Total points
- 412
- Total comments
- 352
100+ points or 50+ comments
reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking
reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking
Every submission
| Date | Title as submitted | By | Points | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-11-10 | Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005) | sea6ear | 3 | 0 |
| 2017-06-23 | Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005) | jlanej | 2 | 0 |
| 2017-11-01 | Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005) | V2hLe0ThslzRaV2 | 4 | 0 |
| 2017-12-15 | Why Most Published Research Findings Are False | golergka | 1 | 0 |
| 2019-03-07 | Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005) | aaavl2821 | 1 | 0 |
| 2019-03-14 | Why Most Published Research Findings Are False – PLOS (2005) | zapoist | 1 | 0 |
| 2020-01-08 | Why Most Published Research Findings Are False | mcenedella | 2 | 0 |
| 2020-08-25 | Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005) | colinprince | 2 | 1 |
| 2020-12-27 | Why Most Published Research Findings Are False | soheilpro | 2 | 0 |
| 2022-05-05 | Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005) | kvee | 6 | 0 |
| 2022-10-19 | Why most published research findings are false (2005)First breakout | Jimmc414 | 157 | 80 |
| 2024-09-24 | Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Best thread · Latest 20+ point return | Michelangelo11 | 231 | 271 |
