Submission timeline
2007–2026One slot for every year since HN launched. Height is that year's peak points; orange marks a 100+ point or 50+ comment breakout. Select a bar to open its strongest thread.
First comments on top threads
HN comment orderHey, author here. As several of you have noted, there are a lot of tweaks to speed this simulation up - making it 2D increases (unphysically) the collision rate, the particles have overly large collision radii, and the fragmentation threshold is quite soft initially but then quite high for small masses. Regardless, I hope the video is fun - the sudden burst of fragmentation makes for quite the sight.
The book is full of large orbital machines. They are explained thoroughly and there are some drawings but I wish the author had pictures and videos of them on his web site to see how they work.
Author here - amazing how this old post comes back around! I know this book is a bit divisive with the big time jump, but you can't argue with the opening line. Shameless plug - I've become a better engineer since then, and if you'd like to work with me check out this role I'm hiring for: https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/count/d49bdc38-96ea-4dbd-9ab5-ae4f5...
The first top-level comment from each of the four biggest threads, in HN’s own order. Excerpts are shortened; open a comment for full context.
- Breakout years
- 2
- Total points
- 869
- Total comments
- 386
100+ points or 50+ comments
reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking
reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking
Every submission
| Date | Title as submitted | By | Points | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-09-21 | “The moon blew up without warning and for no apparent reason”First breakout · Best thread | mhb | 710 | 270 |
| 2021-11-16 | The moon blew up without warning and for no apparent reason (2017) | marcodiego | 83 | 49 |
| 2024-09-16 | The moon blew up without warning and for no apparent reason (2017)Latest 20+ point return | georgecmu | 76 | 67 |
