HN Hall of Fame Weekly email

Programming as Theory Building (1985) [pdf]

pages.cs.wisc.edu Research & data Research papers Software engineering Candidate
Screenshot of pages.cs.wisc.edu captured 2026-07-20
Page preview · captured 2026-07-20

Resurfaced independently across 7 calendar years, with breakout response in 3 of them.

submissions
12
submitters
11
observed span
2016–2026
peak thread · 44 comments
225 pts
latest 20+ return · 2025-01-04
211 pts

Submission timeline

2007–2026

One slot for every year since HN launched. Height is that year's peak points; orange marks a 100+ point or 50+ comment breakout. Select a bar to open its strongest thread.

First comments on top threads

HN comment order

This is an amazing insight into the nature of programming. It feels right to me, and will help me explain what I do to others. I feel privileged to live in an era where many pioneers of our field are still with us. I feel the passing of that era, and their loss, keenly.

One of the most important papers in software engineering, which I believe everyone in this profession should read and internalize. Every time I see another startup trying use LLMs for code generation I sigh in despair. As AI technology improves and becomes better at producing code, what looks like a win in the short term will end up creating more and more code that has been created without a human going through the necessary thought processes and problem solving steps…

The last paragraph: Documentation cannot--and so need not--say everything. Its purpose is to help the next programmer build an accurate theory about the system.

I've really liked this essay and think it's getting at something essential, but at the same time I think some of the conclusions aren't well supported. I heartily agree that a principle part of programming is building, maintaining, and sharing our understanding of the systems. I don't see why that implies that there are no concrete methodologies that could help us do that, and I don't think the essay does a good job of making the link.

The first top-level comment from each of the four biggest threads, in HN’s own order. Excerpts are shortened; open a comment for full context.

Breakout years
3

100+ points or 50+ comments

Total points
651

reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking

Total comments
78

reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking

Every submission