HN Hall of Fame Weekly email

On the Impossibility of Supersized Machines (2017)

arxiv.org Research & data Research papers Computer science Candidate
Screenshot of arxiv.org captured 2026-07-20
Page preview · captured 2026-07-20

Resurfaced independently across 5 calendar years, with breakout response in 2 of them.

submissions
8
submitters
8
observed span
2017–2026
peak thread · 95 comments
85 pts
latest 20+ return · 2024-06-14
59 pts

Submission timeline

2007–2026

One slot for every year since HN launched. Height is that year's peak points; orange marks a 100+ point or 50+ comment breakout. Select a bar to open its strongest thread.

First comments on top threads

HN comment order

Paper published April 1, 2017. References include "Jack and the beanstalk", Tom from Urban Dictionary and The Matrix.

It took me an embarrassing amount of time to realize I was reading a parody of arguments against machines with human level intelligence (or "larger")

Summary: This is a parody of various arguments about superintelligent AI. It opens by parodying the classic futurist parable of history as exponential growth in intellect and technology, recasting history as a tale of growth in size (after all, the earliest organisms were tiny). It recasts fears about superintelligent AI as fears about super-large beings (wouldn't you be afraid of something that could step on you as easily as you step on an ant?). Then it switches to parodying some…

rntz·44-point thread·

wtf..

dusted·10-point thread·

The first top-level comment from each of the four biggest threads, in HN’s own order. Excerpts are shortened; open a comment for full context.

Breakout years
2

100+ points or 50+ comments

Total points
206

reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking

Total comments
177

reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking

Every submission