HN Hall of Fame Weekly email

Destruction of nuclear bombs using ultra-high energy neutrino beam (2003) [pdf]

arxiv.org Research & data Research papers Mathematics & science Candidate
Screenshot of arxiv.org captured 2026-07-20
Page preview · captured 2026-07-20

Resurfaced independently across 2 calendar years, with breakout response in 2 of them.

submissions
4
submitters
4
observed span
2020–2024
peak thread · 137 comments
131 pts
latest 20+ return · 2024-02-06
131 pts

Submission timeline

2007–2026

One slot for every year since HN launched. Height is that year's peak points; orange marks a 100+ point or 50+ comment breakout. Select a bar to open its strongest thread.

First comments on top threads

HN comment order

Note to people who haven't read the paper: This isn't seriously about building a nuclear bomb destroying super-ray. The authors even admit that this is waaaay beyond our current technology. The whole paper feels like a con attempt by the authors to talk governments into building smaller muon colliders as an intermediate step. Of course these smaller colliders could also be used to study concepts of a higher energy collider that could produce anti-nuke rays. But for the most part…

The idea is kind of cool, but doesn't sound very practical. The beam width is my concern. If it's really narrow, then we have to know exactly where every nuclear warhead is to hit it. If it's really wide, then the power draw will be that much more immense, plus a huge risk of collateral damage to any life, human or otherwise, that happens to get in the path of the beam. Not to mention that the prospect of detonating…

ufmace·113-point thread·

The first top-level comment from each of the four biggest threads, in HN’s own order. Excerpts are shortened; open a comment for full context.

Breakout years
2

100+ points or 50+ comments

Total points
251

reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking

Total comments
222

reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking

Every submission