HN Hall of Fame Weekly email

Cross-platform Rust rewrite of the GNU coreutils

Screenshot of github.com captured 2026-07-20
Page preview · captured 2026-07-20

Resurfaced independently across 7 calendar years, with breakout response in 4 of them.

submissions
12
submitters
10
observed span
2013–2026
peak thread · 487 comments
548 pts
latest 20+ return · 2024-01-03
302 pts

Submission timeline

2007–2026

One slot for every year since HN launched. Height is that year's peak points; orange marks a 100+ point or 50+ comment breakout. Select a bar to open its strongest thread.

First comments on top threads

HN comment order

Rust is a great choice for systems programming it'd seem. Esp considering that a well-tested, battle-hardened code-base like SQLite faces problems [1] solely due to the nature of the language its written in. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11312918

Genuine question: since these are core utils, and probably used billions of times every day, is anyone actually going to switch to this version? I see that the intention is for this to be a drop-in replacement, but some options and behaviours are still different. To clarify, I'm not intending this as a negative comment. It's an impressive project, and aiming for cross-platform sharing of scripts seems a worthy goal. The graph of progress against the GNU test suite is…

Note GNU coreutils has a good test suite which just calls out to the various tools from shell and perl scripts. It should be easy enough to run this implementation through it. More effort goes into the coreutils tests than the code. One of the hardest parts of coreutils is keeping it working everywhere, including handling that buggy version of function X in libc Y on distro Z. That's handled for GNU coreutils by gnulib, which currently has nearly 10K…

2014, 208 comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7882211 2016, 490 comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11337399

The first top-level comment from each of the four biggest threads, in HN’s own order. Excerpts are shortened; open a comment for full context.

Breakout years
4

100+ points or 50+ comments

Total points
1415

reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking

Total comments
1318

reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking

Every submission