Submission timeline
2007–2026One slot for every year since HN launched. Height is that year's peak points; orange marks a 100+ point or 50+ comment breakout. Select a bar to open its strongest thread.
First comments on top threads
HN comment orderThis reminded me of a tight-packed binary format we used in the trading systems domain almost 20 years ago. Instead of including metadata/field names in each message, it had a central message dictionary that every client/server would first download a copy from. Messages had only type IDs, followed by binary packed data in the correct field order. Because of microsecond latency requirements, we even avoided the serialization/deserialization process by making the memory format of the message and the wire format…
After working (internally) with Ion and related tooling, I'd say that I was opposite of fan. Protobuf strength is in good tooling/codegen around it (especially inside of Google), and with Ion you just have "superset of json". Ion never had nice code wrappers around serialized structures, and most of the time, especially with rich structures it was frustrating experience.
The first top-level comment from each of the four biggest threads, in HN’s own order. Excerpts are shortened; open a comment for full context.
- Breakout years
- 2
- Total points
- 722
- Total comments
- 339
100+ points or 50+ comments
reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking
reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking
Every submission
| Date | Title as submitted | By | Points | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-19 | Amazon Ion | abbasaamer | 1 | 0 |
| 2020-07-22 | Amazon IonFirst breakout | BerislavLopac | 307 | 110 |
| 2021-11-20 | Amazon Ion – A richly-typed, self-describing, hierarchical serialization formatBest thread · Latest 20+ point return | gjvc | 414 | 229 |
