Submission timeline
2007–2026One slot for every year since HN launched. Height is that year's peak points; orange marks a 100+ point or 50+ comment breakout. Select a bar to open its strongest thread.
First comments on top threads
HN comment orderTwo observations. First, coming from computer science, introductory accounting - the bookkeeping mechanics - is quite easy. I took a 101 class and was surrounded by future Lords of The Universe who complained about how "hard" it was to add and subtract numbers according to a small system of rules. Accounting is a system of metrics. The system under measurement is your business. Its purpose is to give an accurate readout of business performance. The nice thing is that accountants…
The fundamentals of accounting (in particular double-entry bookkeeping) are simple, but they're often presented or understood as a series of unconnected facts that must be memorized. It doesn't have to be this way! Start with this identity: Equity = Assets - Liabilities This is self-evident: the owners of the company have a claim on the company's assets, but only after any liabilities (like debts to other companies) have been subtracted. That identity can be rearranged: Assets = Equity + Liabilities…
I never understood double entry bookkeeping and that's where the author immediately loses me again: Early on after 4th diagram, author includes sentence : "Because every transaction appears twice, once positive and once negative" There is something so obvious about this to accounting folks that they always make the massive jump without any explanation. The previous diagram absolutely does not have positive and negative for each transaction! In fact, there is 5000 going into banking account and 500+5 coming out…
(2011) Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2298471 Nice explanation even for people who have a good grasp of the basics. The visualization, seeing the flows is particularly interesting.
The first top-level comment from each of the four biggest threads, in HN’s own order. Excerpts are shortened; open a comment for full context.
- Breakout years
- 3
- Total points
- 950
- Total comments
- 199
100+ points or 50+ comments
reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking
reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking
Every submission
| Date | Title as submitted | By | Points | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-03-07 | Accounting for Computer ScientistsFirst breakout · Best thread | martinkl | 520 | 75 |
| 2013-01-21 | Accounting for Computer Scientists | ColinWright | 2 | 0 |
| 2015-05-28 | Accounting for Computer Scientists | bshanks | 3 | 0 |
| 2016-03-07 | Accounting for Computer Scientists (2011) | csense | 16 | 0 |
| 2016-06-24 | Accounting for Computer Scientists | omilu | 1 | 0 |
| 2017-10-10 | Accounting for Computer Scientists | chad_oliver | 4 | 1 |
| 2019-11-27 | Accounting for Computer Scientists | castlegloom | 3 | 0 |
| 2020-08-19 | Accounting for Computer Scientists | eadler | 2 | 0 |
| 2020-12-08 | Accounting for Computer Scientists | gglitch | 1 | 0 |
| 2021-12-20 | Accounting for Computing Scientists | annowiki | 1 | 0 |
| 2022-08-17 | Accounting for Computer Scientists | elilev | 2 | 0 |
| 2023-10-19 | Accounting for Computer ScientistsHall induction | Anon84 | 208 | 50 |
| 2026-01-02 | Accounting for Computer Scientists (2011)Latest 20+ point return | tosh | 187 | 73 |
