HN Hall of Fame Weekly email

RFC 3339 vs. ISO 8601

ijmacd.github.io Reference Standards & specifications Software engineering Candidate
Screenshot of ijmacd.github.io captured 2026-07-20
Page preview · captured 2026-07-20

Resurfaced independently across 3 calendar years, with breakout response in 3 of them.

submissions
4
submitters
4
observed span
2021–2025
peak thread · 271 comments
514 pts
latest 20+ return · 2025-09-07
198 pts

Submission timeline

2007–2026

One slot for every year since HN launched. Height is that year's peak points; orange marks a 100+ point or 50+ comment breakout. Select a bar to open its strongest thread.

First comments on top threads

HN comment order

Note that Python still lacks any way to parse these dates in the standard library. You have to use a third party library to parse them. You might think `datetime.fromisoformat` parsed ISO dates but you'd be wrong; it doesn't support the trailing Z or any other form of timezone information. The docs are clear about this, and the developer discussion I've read basically boils down to "it's too hard to parse ISO dates so we didn't do it here." This…

I find it weird that there's no way to specify a future date/time with respect to a specific timezone, e.g. Europe/London. I don't think it's unreasonable to want to be able to specify a meeting in London, on July 1st 2030, at 6pm local time - no matter what happens to UK timezones between now and then. The UK currently uses Z+00:00 from November to March, and daylight savings of Z+01:00 from April to October (roughly)[0]. But it's possible that…

My favorite datetime format is "YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm:ss". I consider it the "Markdown for time". It is human-friendly and computer-friendly at the same time. It is supported by many languages and databases. It is so elegant and common that even though it is not part of a standard, LLMs started to use it when writing answers: Me: SQLite: Add 1 day and 3 hours to a date. Perplexity: SELECT DATETIME('2025-09-07 07:51:00', '+1 day', '+3 hours');

mg·198-point thread·

The first top-level comment from each of the four biggest threads, in HN’s own order. Excerpts are shortened; open a comment for full context.

Breakout years
3

100+ points or 50+ comments

Total points
1198

reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking

Total comments
599

reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking

Every submission

DateTitle as submittedByPointsComments
2021-08-01RFC 3339 vs. ISO 8601oftenwrong40
2021-10-24RFC 3339 vs. ISO 8601First breakout · Best threadrdpintqogeogsaa514172
2023-08-31RFC 3339 vs. ISO 8601iamwil482271
2025-09-07RFC 3339 vs. ISO 8601Latest 20+ point returngregsadetsky198156