Submission timeline
2007–2026One slot for every year since HN launched. Height is that year's peak points; orange marks a 100+ point or 50+ comment breakout. Select a bar to open its strongest thread.
First comments on top threads
HN comment orderAt 1:08:35 Feynman tries to put his glasses in his t-shirt, thinking he has on a dress shirt with a pocket. He plays it off by rubbing the glasses against his t-shirt. Pretty awesome how he's still making me smile and chuckle from the grave. Hats off to you Mr. Feynman. Your output may have been finite, but its effect is limitless. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKWGGDXe5MA&t=1h8m35s
Happy to see these videos posted, they are exceptional. He clearly understood this stuff at a very deep level. I recall reading a story somewhere about his collaboration with Danny Hillis at Thinking Machines (I think?) and applying his unique problem solving skills to the issue of coordinating so many individual processors to perform a job. He wasn't a "computer scientist" but he apparently applied some unique ideas that helped significantly. Edit: Here's the link…
Watched this the other day, good layman's introduction to what computers actually do. Feynman has a serious skill at explaining complex topics in simple terms that anyone can understand. love to watch Feynman's lectures even if I have a fairly good understanding of the topic, such an entertaining lecturer.
The comments about the war games is interesting, because I have heard of these same results from defense blogs, and there the opinions are not usually so dismissive (though of course they're citing them to advance their point), in that a lot of people find the idea of small attack boats with a single gun a compelling strategy that the US could never use (for PR/morale reasons), but posit that these are the exact sort of tactics that others like…
The first top-level comment from each of the four biggest threads, in HN’s own order. Excerpts are shortened; open a comment for full context.
- Breakout years
- 2
- Total points
- 417
- Total comments
- 43
100+ points or 50+ comments
reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking
reference only — not used in Hall rules or ranking
